-
What's new
- All What's new
-
European
- What's new - All
- <hr>
- What's new - last 24 hrs
- What's new - last 7 days
- What's new - last 30 days
- <hr>
- New EU Legislation
- European Commission
- European Banking Authority
- European Securities and Markets Authority
- European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
- <hr>
- Consultations and similar
- Commentaries
- <hr>
- Downloads and Exports
- Latest news by Topics
-
International
- What's new - All
- <hr>
- What's new - last 24 hrs
- What's new - last 7 days
- What's new - last 30 days
- <hr>
- Bank for International Settlements
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
- Egmont Group
- International Association of Insurance Supervisors
- International Monetary Fund
- <hr>
- Consultations and similar
- Commentaries
- <hr>
- Downloads and Exports
- Latest news by Topics
- Downloads and Exports
- Legislation
- Organisations
-
Commentaries
- Consultations
- Sanctioned regimes
- IFRSs
- Regulatory calendar
- Quicklinks
-
More
Table of Contents
Page Overview
Document Overview
AI Summary of Article 102 Precautionary measures
Where the competent authority of a host Member State has clear and demonstrable grounds to suspect irregularities in the activities of an offeror or person seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets, an issuer of an asset‑referenced token or e‑money token, or a crypto‑asset service provider, it shall notify the competent authority of the home Member State and ESMA. Where those irregularities concern an issuer of an asset‑referenced token or e‑money token, or a crypto‑asset service related to such tokens, the competent authority of the host Member State shall also notify EBA.
Where irregularities persist despite measures by the home competent authority and amount to an infringement, the host competent authority, after informing the home authority, ESMA and, where appropriate, EBA, shall take appropriate measures to protect clients and holders, in particular retail holders, including preventing further activities in the host Member State, and inform ESMA and, where appropriate, EBA without undue delay; ESMA and EBA shall inform the Commission. If the home competent authority disagrees with measures taken by the host authority it may bring the matter to ESMA under Article 19(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010; by way of derogation, where measures concern asset‑referenced or e‑money tokens or related services the host authority may bring the matter to EBA under Article 19(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
AI Disclaimer
Please note that AI-generated content should not be considered legal advice. Users are encouraged to consult with qualified professionals or legal advisors where specific legal guidance is required.
We are committed to transparency and responsible use of AI in a way that supports, but never replaces, human expertise.
If you have any questions or concerns about the use of AI on our platform, please feel free to contact us.
Article 102 Precautionary measures
1. Where the competent authority of a host Member State has clear and demonstrable grounds for suspecting that there are irregularities in the activities of an offeror or person seeking admission to trading of crypto-assets, an issuer of an asset-referenced token or e-money token, or a crypto-asset service provider, it shall notify the competent authority of the home Member State and ESMA thereof.
Where the irregularities referred to in the first subparagraph concern an issuer of an asset-referenced token or e-money token, or a crypto-asset service related to asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens, the competent authority of the host Member State shall also notify EBA.