-
What's new
- All What's new
-
European
- What's new - All
- <hr>
- What's new - last 24 hrs
- What's new - last 7 days
- What's new - last 30 days
- <hr>
- New EU Legislation
- European Commission
- European Banking Authority
- European Securities and Markets Authority
- European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
- <hr>
- Consultations and similar
- Commentaries
- <hr>
- Downloads and Exports
- Latest news by Topics
-
International
- What's new - All
- <hr>
- What's new - last 24 hrs
- What's new - last 7 days
- What's new - last 30 days
- <hr>
- Bank for International Settlements
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
- Egmont Group
- International Association of Insurance Supervisors
- International Monetary Fund
- <hr>
- Consultations and similar
- Commentaries
- <hr>
- Downloads and Exports
- Latest news by Topics
- Downloads and Exports
- Legislation
- Organisations
-
Commentaries
- Consultations
- Sanctioned regimes
- IFRSs
- Regulatory calendar
- Quicklinks
-
More
Table of Contents
Document Overview
AI Disclaimer
Please note that AI-generated content should not be considered legal advice. Users are encouraged to consult with qualified professionals or legal advisors where specific legal guidance is required.
We are committed to transparency and responsible use of AI in a way that supports, but never replaces, human expertise.
If you have any questions or concerns about the use of AI on our platform, please feel free to contact us.
3.7
Where a firm uses automated IT systems to allocate overall risk scores to categorise business relationships or occasional transactions and does not develop these in house but purchases them from an external provider, it should understand how the system works and how it combines or weights, risk factors to achieve an overall risk score. A firm must always be able to satisfy itself that the scores allocated reflect the firm’s understanding of ML/TF risk and it should be able to demonstrate this to the competent authority.