-
What's new
- All What's new
-
European
- What's new - All
- <hr>
- What's new - last 24 hrs
- What's new - last 7 days
- What's new - last 30 days
- <hr>
- New EU Legislation
- European Commission
- European Banking Authority
- European Securities and Markets Authority
- European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
- <hr>
- Consultations and similar
- Commentaries
- <hr>
- Downloads and Exports
- Latest news by Topics
-
International
- What's new - All
- <hr>
- What's new - last 24 hrs
- What's new - last 7 days
- What's new - last 30 days
- <hr>
- Bank for International Settlements
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
- Egmont Group
- International Association of Insurance Supervisors
- International Monetary Fund
- <hr>
- Consultations and similar
- Commentaries
- <hr>
- Downloads and Exports
- Latest news by Topics
- Downloads and Exports
- Legislation
- Organisations
-
Commentaries
- Consultations
- Sanctioned regimes
- IFRSs
- Regulatory calendar
- Quicklinks
-
More
Table of Contents
Page Overview
Document Overview
AI Disclaimer
Please note that AI-generated content should not be considered legal advice. Users are encouraged to consult with qualified professionals or legal advisors where specific legal guidance is required.
We are committed to transparency and responsible use of AI in a way that supports, but never replaces, human expertise.
If you have any questions or concerns about the use of AI on our platform, please feel free to contact us.
109C. Grounds of refusal to grant certificate of fitness.
Amendments (requiring commencement) by Sch. 1 to the Garda Síochána (Functions and Operational Areas) Act 2022 (No. 7), published 4 May 2022.
Amendments (requiring commencement) by Sch. 2, Pt 1 of the Gambling Regulation Act 2024 (No. 35), published 23 October 2024.
(1) A Superintendent of the Garda Síochána or, as the case may be, the Minister shall not refuse an application for a certificate of fitness made in accordance with section 109B unless -
(a) a relevant consideration exists, or
(b) he or she is not satisfied that the applicant has provided such information as he or she reasonably requires for the purposes of determining whether a relevant consideration exists.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a relevant consideration exists if -
(a) the applicant stands convicted of an offence under -
(i) an enactment relating to excise duty on betting,
(ii) the Gaming and Lotteries Acts 1956 to 2013,
(iii) section 1078 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997,
(iv) the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001, or
(v) this Act,
(b) the applicant stands convicted of an offence under the law of a place (other than the State) -
(i) consisting of an act or omission that, if committed in the State, would constitute an offence referred to in paragraph (a), or