-
What's new
- All What's new
-
European
- What's new - All
- <hr>
- What's new - last 24 hrs
- What's new - last 7 days
- What's new - last 30 days
- <hr>
- New EU Legislation
- European Commission
- European Banking Authority
- European Securities and Markets Authority
- European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
- <hr>
- Consultations and similar
- Commentaries
- <hr>
- Downloads and Exports
- Latest news by Topics
-
International
- What's new - All
- <hr>
- What's new - last 24 hrs
- What's new - last 7 days
- What's new - last 30 days
- <hr>
- Bank for International Settlements
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
- Egmont Group
- International Association of Insurance Supervisors
- International Monetary Fund
- <hr>
- Consultations and similar
- Commentaries
- <hr>
- Downloads and Exports
- Latest news by Topics
- Downloads and Exports
- Legislation
- Organisations
-
Commentaries
- Consultations
- Sanctioned regimes
- IFRSs
- Regulatory calendar
- Quicklinks
-
More
Table of Contents
Page Overview
Document Overview
AI Summary of Article 6 Assessment of recovery plans
Member States must require institutions subject to recovery‑plan obligations to submit plans to the competent authority, which shall review each plan within six months of submission and consult competent authorities of Member States where significant branches are located. The review must assess whether proposed arrangements are reasonably likely to maintain or restore the institution’s or group’s viability and financial position and whether plan options are capable of rapid and effective implementation in stress, including concurrent systemic scenarios; the authority shall take into consideration the appropriateness of the institution’s capital and funding structure. The competent authority must provide the recovery plan to the resolution authority, which may examine it for resolvability impacts and make recommendations.
Where material deficiencies or impediments are identified the competent authority shall require a revised plan within three months (extendable by one month) and give the institution an opportunity to state its opinion; it may direct specific changes if the revision is inadequate. If deficiencies cannot be remedied by revision, the authority may require the institution to identify business changes or may direct proportionate measures, including reducing risk profile, enabling timely recapitalisation, reviewing strategy and structure, changing funding strategy and governance. Such measures must be reasoned, proportionate, notified in writing and subject to a right of appeal. The EBA shall submit draft regulatory technical standards on minimum assessment criteria to the Commission by 3 July 2015, with delegated power for adoption.
AI Disclaimer
Please note that AI-generated content should not be considered legal advice. Users are encouraged to consult with qualified professionals or legal advisors where specific legal guidance is required.
We are committed to transparency and responsible use of AI in a way that supports, but never replaces, human expertise.
If you have any questions or concerns about the use of AI on our platform, please feel free to contact us.
Article 6 Assessment of recovery plans
1. Member States shall require institutions that are required to draw up recovery plans under Article 5(1) and Article 7(1) to submit those recovery plans to the competent authority for review. Member States shall require institutions to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the competent authority that those plans meet the criteria of paragraph 2.
2. The competent authorities shall, within six months of the submission of each plan, and after consulting the competent authorities of the Member States where significant branches are located insofar as is relevant to that branch, review it and assess the extent to which it satisfies the requirements laid down in Article 5 and the following criteria:
(a) the implementation of the arrangements proposed in the plan is reasonably likely to maintain or restore the viability and financial position of the institution or of the group, taking into account the preparatory measures that the institution has taken or has planned to take;