-
What's new
- All What's new
-
European
- What's new - All
- <hr>
- What's new - last 24 hrs
- What's new - last 7 days
- What's new - last 30 days
- <hr>
- New EU Legislation
- European Commission
- European Banking Authority
- European Securities and Markets Authority
- European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
- <hr>
- Consultations and similar
- Commentaries
- <hr>
- Downloads and Exports
- Latest news by Topics
-
International
- What's new - All
- <hr>
- What's new - last 24 hrs
- What's new - last 7 days
- What's new - last 30 days
- <hr>
- Bank for International Settlements
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
- Egmont Group
- International Association of Insurance Supervisors
- International Monetary Fund
- <hr>
- Consultations and similar
- Commentaries
- <hr>
- Downloads and Exports
- Latest news by Topics
- Downloads and Exports
- Legislation
- Organisations
-
Commentaries
- Consultations
- Sanctioned regimes
- IFRSs
- Regulatory calendar
- Quicklinks
-
More
Table of Contents
Page Overview
Related
Document Overview
AI Summary of 604. Unfair preference: effect of winding up on antecedent and other transactions
AI Disclaimer
Please note that AI-generated content should not be considered legal advice. Users are encouraged to consult with qualified professionals or legal advisors where specific legal guidance is required.
We are committed to transparency and responsible use of AI in a way that supports, but never replaces, human expertise.
If you have any questions or concerns about the use of AI on our platform, please feel free to contact us.
604. Unfair preference: effect of winding up on antecedent and other transactions
(1) Subsection (2) applies to each of the following acts, namely, any:
(a) conveyance;
(b) mortgage; or
(c) delivery of goods, payment, execution or other act,
relating to property made or done by or against a company, which is unable to pay its debts as they become due, in favour of -
(i) any creditor of the company, or
(ii) any person on trust for any such creditor.
(2) An act to which this subsection applies, that is done with a view to giving the creditor referred to in subsection (1)(i) or (ii) or any surety or guarantor for the debt due to such creditor, a preference over the other creditors of the company, shall be deemed an unfair preference of its creditors and be invalid accordingly if -
(a) a winding up of the company commences within 6 months (or such longer period as the court considers just and equitable having regard to the circumstances of the act concerned) after the date of the doing of the act, and
(b) the company is, at the time of the commencement of the winding up, unable to pay its debts (taking into account the contingent and prospective liabilities).