-
What's new
- All What's new
-
European
- What's new - All
- <hr>
- What's new - last 24 hrs
- What's new - last 7 days
- What's new - last 30 days
- <hr>
- New EU Legislation
- European Commission
- European Banking Authority
- European Securities and Markets Authority
- European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
- <hr>
- Consultations and similar
- Commentaries
- <hr>
- Downloads and Exports
- Latest news by Topics
-
International
- What's new - All
- <hr>
- What's new - last 24 hrs
- What's new - last 7 days
- What's new - last 30 days
- <hr>
- Bank for International Settlements
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
- Egmont Group
- International Association of Insurance Supervisors
- International Monetary Fund
- <hr>
- Consultations and similar
- Commentaries
- <hr>
- Downloads and Exports
- Latest news by Topics
- Downloads and Exports
- Legislation
- Organisations
-
Commentaries
- Consultations
- Sanctioned regimes
- IFRSs
- Regulatory calendar
- Quicklinks
-
More
Table of Contents
Page Overview
Related
Document Overview
AI Summary of Article 274 Exposure value
Institutions may calculate a single exposure value at netting set level where the contractual netting agreement is of a type in Article 295, has been recognised by competent authorities under Article 296 and the institution has fulfilled Article 297; otherwise each transaction is treated as its own netting set. Under the standardised approach exposure value = α·(RC + PFE) where RC is replacement cost per Article 275, PFE is potential future exposure per Article 278 and α = 1.4. A netting set subject to a contractual margin agreement is capped at the exposure value of the same netting set not subject to margin.
Where multiple margin agreements apply, institutions must establish hypothetical sub‑netting sets by margin period of risk and non‑margined transactions; calculate RC taking all transactions into account with CMV computed gross of collateral and NICA, VM, TH and MTA summed across applicable margin inputs; and calculate PFE using the multiplier based on CMV, NICA and VM and separately for each sub‑netting set. Institutions may set exposure to zero for netting sets solely of sold options if CMV is always negative, premiums were received upfront and no margin applies. Finite linear combinations of options must be replaced by the constituent single options for exposure calculation, with a derogation allowing a vanilla digital option to be replicated by a collar of strikes 0.95·K and 1.05·K and the two options’ risk positions calculated under Article 279. A credit derivative long in the underlying may have exposure capped at outstanding unpaid premium if treated as its own non‑margined netting set.
AI Disclaimer
Please note that AI-generated content should not be considered legal advice. Users are encouraged to consult with qualified professionals or legal advisors where specific legal guidance is required.
We are committed to transparency and responsible use of AI in a way that supports, but never replaces, human expertise.
If you have any questions or concerns about the use of AI on our platform, please feel free to contact us.
Article 274 Exposure value
1.An institution may calculate a single exposure value at netting set level for all the transactions covered by a contractual netting agreement where all the following conditions are met:
(a) the netting agreement belongs to one of the types of contractual netting agreements referred to in Article 295;
(b) the netting agreement has been recognised by competent authorities in accordance with Article 296;
(c) the institution has fulfilled the obligations laid down in Article 297 in respect of the netting agreement.
Where any of the conditions set out in the first subparagraph are not met, the institution shall treat each transaction as if it was its own netting set.
2. Institutions shall calculate the exposure value of a netting set under the standardised approach for counterparty credit risk as follows:
exposure value = α · (RC + PFE)
where:
RC = the replacement cost calculated in accordance with Article 275; and